Stand Up in the Name of Freedom!!!

UPDATE: Please visit my buddy Patrick's blog and read his latest blog entry "Liberals Throw Kid Under Bus, so They Can Have Last Chance to Save Failing Smear Campaign." It is a hard-hitting piece that further highlights the vile nature of the leftist blogosphere.

Don't you just love how the liberal left loves to dish criticism,but can't take it? Well, my response is simple: "Suck it up, buttercup." As I have mentioned before, I get attacked daily on Twitter and by liberals who visit my blog. I have gotten attacked from a variety of members on the left, ranging from liberal Alaskan bloggers, who have wasted Alaskan taxpayers' dollars simply because of a vendetta they hold against Sarah, to liberal loons who obviously have no idea what the constitution is. The comments usually have no intellectual substance and are usually full of vile, and sexual innuendo. I am not the young, naive girl I once was. I no longer sit back and allow individuals to attack those whom I care about and support. When I am attacked on Twitter, I press on and continue to stand up and speak out, and I hope you all do this too. Don't let the liberal left tell you that you can't make a difference. Don't let the liberal left get you down and put you in a corner. Remember, that is what they want you to do. They want you to sit down and shut up because when you do this, the liberal left views this as a victory for liberalism. When I am attacked, I know that my message is getting out there, and this makes every attack I receive from the liberal left more than worth it. Press on just like Sarah Palin does. She is a prominent example of an individual who continues to drive liberals crazy. If she wasn't such a threat, the liberal left would not care about what she says or writes.

As my regular readers know, I have never written about the actions of Levi because frankly, his actions are not what this blog is based upon. As a citizen journalist, I do feel it is important to call it like I see it and to call out anyone or any group whom I find to be dishonest or questionable in their actions. It is no secret that the custody case for little Tripp has been opened to the public. While I said I will not go into extreme detail about the case itself, I will address some information that has recently been discovered regarding the two judges who made the decision to open the case to the public.

If you are on Facebook, I encourage you all to join Barracuda Brigade for Our American Girl! 2012. This is a great group that has spread the awareness about these judges and their liberal voting record. The two judges in question are Superior Court Judge Kari C. Kristiansen and Superior Court Judge Sharon Gleason. Kristiansen issued the ruling to open up the case to the public under the authority of Gleason. I, for one, was astonished that these judges decided that it was in the best interest of little Tripp to open the custody case to the public. How is having the public aware of every aspect of the proceedings a good thing for Tripp or his mother? As I began to think about this, I began to research for more information about the individuals who made the decision to open the case to the public. What I found was astonishing. Not only were both of these judges appointed by Former Democratic Governor Tony Knowles, but both have a clear,transparent, liberal voting record. It is also important to note that Kristiansen and Gleason are up for re-appointment later this year. Judges are supposed to look out for the best interests of children, but it appears these two liberal judges may have let their personal, political beliefs guide them in the decision process.

While Superior Court Judge Sharon Gleason's name may not sound familiar, there is an issue she ruled on that has caused widespread controversy. The aerial wolf control program is a hot-button issue. While this is an issue for Alaskans, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) with the help of celebrities like Ashley Judd amped up attacks last year against the control program, targeting then-Governor Sarah Palin firsthand. Those against the aerial control program argue that the wolf population is getting killed at a rapid rate, while those in favor of the program argue that moose and caribou numbers are in serious decline because they are preyed upon by the wolves. I agree with those who are in favor of the aerial program. Having researched and spoken with Alaskans, it is clear that Alaskans depend on moose and caribou as their prime source of protein along with seafood. Back in January of 2006, Judge Gleason ruled that the aerial wolf control program, authorized by the AK Board of Game, was illegal. Thankfully for Alaskans, the aerial control program was finally put back in place. Judge Gleason is not alone in her leftist mindset. Thomas Lamb over at Red County recently wrote an article about the child custody ruling made by these two judges. In the article he writes:


"... Alaska Superior Court Judge Kari Kristiansen ruled 'that Bristol Palin hadn't provided any evidence that Tripp would be harmed by the anticipated publicity. She ordered all the sealed records opened.'

Right....

She finds that there would be no evidence that would harm Tripp with the anticipated publicity.

How about when he gets older? Hmmm, the judge never considered that one.

Nothing like seeing re-runs of dear ole' Dad air his 15 minutes of trashing his grandmother in public, er make that in court and then in public.

Moreover, when it comes to sealing records; in cases of child abuse, records are sealed many times to protect the privacy of the parents. Or how about adoption proceedings? Same thing."

This so-called judge didn't believe Tripp would be harmed in a public case? This is simply insane. We all know Sarah is a public person. She is threatened on a daily basis by the extreme left. Bristol is her daughter, and Tripp is her grandson. They reside with Sarah and Todd. How dare this judge deny them the privacy and security that most other children are given during a custody case. Public persons like exes Britney Spears and Kevin Federline, as well as exes Alec Baldwin and Kim Basinger both were granted private proceedings. Something tells me had Gleason been presiding over these cases or that of a prominent individual on the left, the result would have been different. This is just another example of members of the left using their powerful positions in an attempt to destroy Sarah and her family. A sealed custody case clearly would have been "in the best interest of the child." Lamb makes a great point in discussing how off-base Kristiansen was in her decision:

"... she [Kristiansen] has created an environment that will promote the animosity between parties which never serves the best interest of the child.

That is why family mediation is becoming popular.

And again, Kristiansen misses the mark on what is the best case scenario for handling a custody case.

After looking at Kristiansen's file, she shouldn't be handling child custody cases, because even though she has had (according to her) litigated a few custody and CINA [Child in Need of Aid] cases, it is telling she lacks the sensitivity to handle a case like this, when she comes up with her bogus reasoning that the publicity will not harm the child.

That alone makes me think she shouldn't even be a judge. She hasn't considered the long term effect. But Judges like her never do. It's all about the here and now and what the time is on the clock in the court room.

Instead of being a judge, Kristiansen should still be practicing law for some environmentalist group."

Way to go, Mr. Lamb. It is clear that both Gleason and Kristianson are more suited to practicing law for some environmental group. Maybe the WWF is in need of a couple lawyers? It all comes back to Sarah and her beliefs. The information I have gathered gives me great cause to believe that Gleason and Kristiansen both had a personal agenda when they went against the best interests of little Tripp and made this custody hearing public. You don't have to spend that much time surfing the web to see how giddy the leftist blogosphere is at the decision to have this case opened to the public. They know they will be able to exploit the Palin family. The vile, extremist far left are like vultures, eagerly waiting for the moment in which they can strike.

While the liberal left claim to be tolerant, they are anything but. The Facebook group that I cited at the beginning of this post has received threats, just because they are reporting this story and releasing the phone numbers and email addresses of the two judges in question, when the numbers are public record and can easily be Googled on the internet. Alaska's #1 Radio Talk Show Host Eddie Burke is getting threatened as well just because he is reporting this story. Another individual who has gotten unfairly attacked is Jessica, who owns the Beehive Beauty Shop in Alaska and is Sarah's hair dresser. Jessica is a sweet, honest woman who cares about the Palin family. Isn't it ironic that when these individuals want to voice their First-Amendment right, they are threatened and told that they shouldn't be doing so? They have broken no laws in publishing the phone numbers and email addresses, for all are public record. It all comes back to this: The left can dish it, but cannot take it. How dare they go after an individual simply for speaking out. I don't see conservatives threatening members of the left for exercising their First-Amendment right, and this is because conservatives, like myself, know that everyone should be able to have his or her say. The left is not going to win, for we will not sit down, and we will not shut up! The vile left can try as they might to silence us, but they will not succeed. The more they push at us, the more we will push back. While I am extremely disgusted at these liberal judges for deciding against the best interest of Tripp, I will not back down in reporting the truth. The questionable actions of Kristiansen and Gleason shed light on just how vile and down-right hateful the far left is. Perhaps Lamb put it best at the close of his article:

"Judge Kristiansen, we'll be watching and writing about your rulings..... After all, who knows, you may be the next pick to be sitting on Alaska's Supreme Court.

That is Alaska's judicial system for you..."

Lamb may be on to something. It certainly would not be the first time that a high-ranking Alaskan Official gets rewarded for his/her questionable actions. It seems as if we are living in a Chicago-thug-style political era. An era in which political favors and handouts are given in return for information or wrong-doings. Our founding fathers would be ashamed! Perhaps there is no better time to push on and to fight on in the name of freedom and liberty. Don't give up, and don't give in because the future of our country depends on you!!! I encourage you to visit and become a member of the Barracuda Brigade for Our American Girl! 2012 on Facebook. Visit this group page and find out how you can get involved. I also encourage you to sign up for this groups event Tripp is not a Political Football. Here is a description of this event from it's organizers:

"The Tripp is not a Political Football protest will formally begin on Thursday Jan. 7th at 12pm. cst. We ask all concerned to call, fax and e-mail Governor Parnell: also to call and write both Judges and let them know: Patriots across America find your actions a disgrace to the Judicial system. That our concerns are being directed to the Governor's Office.

It is important we remember, fellow patriots, that together, we can make a difference. Let your voice be heard!!!


(Click here to follow me on Twitter.)